Selective Hiring and Welfare Analysis in
Labor Market Models
Christian Merkl and Thijs van Rens
Abstract
Firms select not only how many, but also which workers
to hire. Yet, in most labor market models all workers have the same probability
of being hired. We argue that selective hiring crucially affects welfare
analysis. We set up a model that is isomorphic to a search model under random
hiring but allows for selective hiring. With selective hiring, the positive
predictions of the model change very little, but implications for welfare are
different for two reasons. First, a hiring externality occurs with random but
not with selective hiring. Second, the welfare costs of unemployment are much
larger with selective hiring, because unemployment risk is distributed
unequally across workers.
Published in Labour
Economics, 57, pp.117-130, April 2019
October 2018 [download pdf] – Also available as CEPR
Discussion Paper 13272
Earlier version available as IZA
Discussion Paper 6294
First version: March 2011
Highlights
• The
common assumption that all workers are equally employable is unrealistic
• Relaxing
the assumption maintains positive predictions but changes welfare analysis
• With selective
hiring, there is no externality leading to overhiring
• But
unemployment is unequally distributed across workers, making it very costly
• Optimal
unemployment insurance is therefore higher than previously thought
Thijs van Rens | IDEAS/RePEc | Google Scholar | ResearchGate